[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024211727.GB83082@google.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:17:27 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, tytso@....edu,
jaegeuk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypto: remove unneeded Kconfig dependencies
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:41:08PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> FWIW, Strictly speaking we could also get rid of the dependency on BLOCK.
> Only very few functions in fs/crypto/crypto.c use block specific functions,
> these could be placed in a different file.
> The use case would be very small systems with UBIFS and encrypted files.
> i.e. kexec() style bootloaders.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
Yes, that makes sense if UBIFS is going to be using the code too. Feel free to
propose a patch. As I understand it, the assumption would be that if a
filesystem needs the block-specific functions in fs/crypto/, then it itself
would necessarily already depend on CONFIG_BLOCK. It should work to just
conditionally compile the block-specific functions based on CONFIG_BLOCK, either
via #ifdefs or by having a separate file like fs/crypto/block.c and putting
'fscrypto-$(CONFIG_BLOCK) += block.o' in fs/crypto/Makefile. The separate file
sounds preferable.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists