[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-194567-13602-DQj6raDA5A@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:00:11 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...nel.org
Subject: [Bug 194567] ext4 no longer mounts
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194567
Eric Sandeen (sandeen@...deen.net) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sandeen@...deen.net
--- Comment #1 from Eric Sandeen (sandeen@...deen.net) ---
Can you add the dumpe2fs -h output for the device?
I guess this would be thanks to:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?h=linux-4.4.y&id=e21a3cad35bc2f4c7fff317e2c7d38eed363a430
ext4: validate s_first_meta_bg at mount time
commit 3a4b77cd47bb837b8557595ec7425f281f2ca1fe upstream.
Ralf Spenneberg reported that he hit a kernel crash when mounting a
modified ext4 image. And it turns out that kernel crashed when
calculating fs overhead (ext4_calculate_overhead()), this is because
the image has very large s_first_meta_bg (debug code shows it's
842150400), and ext4 overruns the memory in count_overhead() when
setting bitmap buffer, which is PAGE_SIZE.
ext4_calculate_overhead():
buf = get_zeroed_page(GFP_NOFS); <=== PAGE_SIZE buffer
blks = count_overhead(sb, i, buf);
count_overhead():
for (j = ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, grp); j > 0; j--) { <=== j = 842150400
ext4_set_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, s++), buf); <=== buffer overrun
count++;
}
This can be reproduced easily for me by this script:
#!/bin/bash
rm -f fs.img
mkdir -p /mnt/ext4
fallocate -l 16M fs.img
mke2fs -t ext4 -O bigalloc,meta_bg,^resize_inode -F fs.img
debugfs -w -R "ssv first_meta_bg 842150400" fs.img
mount -o loop fs.img /mnt/ext4
Fix it by validating s_first_meta_bg first at mount time, and
refusing to mount if its value exceeds the largest possible meta_bg
number.
Reported-by: Ralf Spenneberg <ralf@...t.de>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists