[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170427174557.GB8130@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:45:57 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypt: update mailing list, patchwork,
and git
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:37:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > +FSCRYPT: FILE SYSTEM LEVEL ENCRYPTION SUPPORT
> > M: Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> > M: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>
> IMHO we should also add such an entry, to match reality:
>
> R: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
Well, we could, but IMO it's a little pointless since there's now a dedicated
mailing list, so there's no need to Cc me separately from the list. I think
explicitly listing reviewer(s) is more useful for subsystems that don't have a
dedicated mailing list.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists