[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c980efed-3bd2-36f5-5564-060513f48e6c@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 21:12:40 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypt: update mailing list, patchwork, and
git
Eric,
Am 27.04.2017 um 19:45 schrieb Eric Biggers:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:37:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> +FSCRYPT: FILE SYSTEM LEVEL ENCRYPTION SUPPORT
>>> M: Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
>>> M: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>
>> IMHO we should also add such an entry, to match reality:
>>
>> R: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>>
>
> Well, we could, but IMO it's a little pointless since there's now a dedicated
> mailing list, so there's no need to Cc me separately from the list. I think
> explicitly listing reviewer(s) is more useful for subsystems that don't have a
> dedicated mailing list.
It depends on your workflow.
i.e. my mail filters give mails that go directly to me a much higher priority.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists