[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170712092023.GB8251@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:20:23 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iomap: Switch from blkno to physical offset
Maybe diskaddr or just addr instead of physical which sounds a little
confusing?
Also how well was this tested? With all the calculation I'm a little
worried about overflows, so a full xfstests run including sub-page
blocksize and DAX really is in order here.
> +#define IOMAP_F_INLINE 0x40 /* data mixed with metadata */
data inline in the inode?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists