[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801021615510.23552@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:16:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
cc: "rpeterso@...hat.com" <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
"julia.lawall@...6.fr" <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"esc.storagedev@...rosemi.com" <esc.storagedev@...rosemi.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dccp@...r.kernel.org" <dccp@...r.kernel.org>,
"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/12] drop unneeded newline
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 15:00 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Bob Peterson wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > Still, the GFS2 and DLM code has a plethora of broken-up printk messages,
> > > and I don't like the thought of re-combining them all.
> >
> > Actually, the point of the patch was to remove the unnecessary \n at the
> > end of the string, because log_print will add another one. If you prefer
> > to keep the string broken up, I can resend the patch in that form, but
> > without the unnecessary \n.
>
> Please combine any user-visible strings into a single line for which the
> unneeded newline is dropped since these strings are modified anyway by
> your patch.
That is what the submitted patch (2/12 specifically) did.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists