lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1514905900.4242.4.camel@wdc.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:11:42 +0000 From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com> To: "rpeterso@...hat.com" <rpeterso@...hat.com>, "julia.lawall@...6.fr" <julia.lawall@...6.fr> CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>, "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, "esc.storagedev@...rosemi.com" <esc.storagedev@...rosemi.com>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, "dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "dccp@...r.kernel.org" <dccp@...r.kernel.org>, "cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/12] drop unneeded newline On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 15:00 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Bob Peterson wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > Still, the GFS2 and DLM code has a plethora of broken-up printk messages, > > and I don't like the thought of re-combining them all. > > Actually, the point of the patch was to remove the unnecessary \n at the > end of the string, because log_print will add another one. If you prefer > to keep the string broken up, I can resend the patch in that form, but > without the unnecessary \n. Please combine any user-visible strings into a single line for which the unneeded newline is dropped since these strings are modified anyway by your patch. Thanks, Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists