lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:46:41 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...marydata.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:29 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote: > > Do you mind just taking it directly? I don't have anything else queued > up for this cycle. Done. I wonder if "false for same, true for different" calling convention makes much sense, but it matches the old "0 for same" so obviously makes for a smaller diff. If it ever ends up confusing people, maybe the sense of that function should be reversed, and the name changed to something like "same_inode_version()" or something. But at least for now the situation seems ok to me, Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists