lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:40:23 +0300
From:   Artem Blagodarenko <>
To:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <>
Cc:     Liu Bo <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ext4: fix slow writeback under dioread_nolock and

Hello Theodore,

> On 21 Nov 2018, at 03:07, Theodore Y. Ts'o <> wrote:
> *) Drop support for nodelalloc, and make delayed allocation the
>   default.  (This requires dropping data=journal mode, since
>   data=journal mode does not co-exist with delalloc.)
> The last was assuming that there really wasn't good use cases where
> people would really want to use nodelalloc, aside from ext3
> bug-for-bug compatibility, and hopefully since most people are using
> ext4 these days, it becomes easier to make the case tha we don't need
> to support ext3's unusual performance attributes.

Currently Lustre FS uses “nodelalloc” option at least because of this two reasons:

- OSD (layer that interact with EXT4 (LDISKFS backend) expect synchronous behaviour.

- delalloc optimise block allocation the way useless for Lustre FS, because data is striped across of OSTs. 
Lustre FS has its own optimisations. Its behaviour similar with data=journal journaling mode. “Journal” is stored on clients and OST recovery is like journal replay.

Best regards,
Artem Blagodarenko.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists