[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190124180504.19912-1-malat@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:05:04 +0100
From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext2: Annotate implicit fall through in __ext2_truncate_blocks
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
these places in the code produced warnings (W=1).
This commit removes the following warnings:
fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
---
fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index e4bb9386c045..e64029b1bd50 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -1239,6 +1239,7 @@ static void __ext2_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
ext2_free_branches(inode, &nr, &nr+1, 1);
}
+ /* fall through */
case EXT2_IND_BLOCK:
nr = i_data[EXT2_DIND_BLOCK];
if (nr) {
@@ -1246,6 +1247,7 @@ static void __ext2_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
ext2_free_branches(inode, &nr, &nr+1, 2);
}
+ /* fall through */
case EXT2_DIND_BLOCK:
nr = i_data[EXT2_TIND_BLOCK];
if (nr) {
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists