[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190128145105.GA5858@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:51:05 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: Annotate implicit fall through in
__ext2_truncate_blocks
On Thu 24-01-19 19:05:04, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
> these places in the code produced warnings (W=1).
>
> This commit removes the following warnings:
>
> fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Thanks for the patch! I've added it to my tree.
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> index e4bb9386c045..e64029b1bd50 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -1239,6 +1239,7 @@ static void __ext2_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
> mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> ext2_free_branches(inode, &nr, &nr+1, 1);
> }
> + /* fall through */
> case EXT2_IND_BLOCK:
> nr = i_data[EXT2_DIND_BLOCK];
> if (nr) {
> @@ -1246,6 +1247,7 @@ static void __ext2_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
> mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> ext2_free_branches(inode, &nr, &nr+1, 2);
> }
> + /* fall through */
> case EXT2_DIND_BLOCK:
> nr = i_data[EXT2_TIND_BLOCK];
> if (nr) {
> --
> 2.19.2
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists