lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:46:31 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Lakshmipathi.G" <lakshmipathi.ganapathi@...labora.co.uk> Subject: Re: Removing the shared class of tests On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > The shared/006 test needs some way of descriminating which inodes have > > a fixed number of inodes, since it fills a small file system until it > > runs out of space and then runs fsck on it. Actually, if we make the > > test file system smaller, so it runs in finite time, we could probably > > just run it on all file systems, since checking to see what file > > systems which don't have a fixed inode table (e.g., btrfs) do under > > ENOSPC when creating tons of inodes probably makes sense there for > > those file systems as well. > > xfs doesn't have a fixed inode table either, so ... that sounds like a > good idea. Which is amusing, given that shared/006 declares that it is supported for xfs. So it might just work on btrfs w/o any changes; although maybe it just takes too long to run. :-) - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists