lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:16:10 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        "Lakshmipathi.G" <lakshmipathi.ganapathi@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Removing the shared class of tests

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > I'm not sure why shared/011 is only run on ext4 and btrfs.  Does
> > cgroup-aware writeback not work on other file systems?
> 
> IIRC it doesn't work on xfs because the author never quite answered
> Dave's question about whether or not it would cause ... io priority
> inversions or something?  There was some unanswered question (iirc) so
> nobody RVB'd the patch and it never went upstream.

I've got a new and tested patch to support cgroup writeback on xfs that
I'll send out today.  But even with that lots of file systems don't
support cgroup writeback and there is no easy way to autodetect the
support.  As far as I an tell ext2 and f2fs also support cgroup
writeback, so they should be added a well.


As for the higher level question?  The shared tests always confused the
heck out of me.  generic with the right feature checks seem like a much
better idea.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists