lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190624071610.GA10195@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:16:10 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Lakshmipathi.G" <lakshmipathi.ganapathi@...labora.co.uk> Subject: Re: Removing the shared class of tests On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > I'm not sure why shared/011 is only run on ext4 and btrfs. Does > > cgroup-aware writeback not work on other file systems? > > IIRC it doesn't work on xfs because the author never quite answered > Dave's question about whether or not it would cause ... io priority > inversions or something? There was some unanswered question (iirc) so > nobody RVB'd the patch and it never went upstream. I've got a new and tested patch to support cgroup writeback on xfs that I'll send out today. But even with that lots of file systems don't support cgroup writeback and there is no easy way to autodetect the support. As far as I an tell ext2 and f2fs also support cgroup writeback, so they should be added a well. As for the higher level question? The shared tests always confused the heck out of me. generic with the right feature checks seem like a much better idea.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists