[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-203943-13602-EqKWhqvEWE@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:34:36 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 203943] ext4 corruption after RAID6 degraded; e2fsck skips
block checks and fails
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203943
--- Comment #5 from Yann Ormanns (yann@...anns.net) ---
Thank you for your support, Ted. About one week before the RAID got degraded, I
created a full file-based backup, so at least I can expect minimal data loss -
I just would like to save the time it would take to copy ~22TB back :-)
Before filing a possible bug in the correct section for RAID, I'd like to
comprehend the steps you described.
In fact e2fsck does not report inode numbers, only variables ("%$i", and so
does it for blocks, "%$b").
Using the the total inode count number in debugfs leads to an error:
share ~ # tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/share | grep "Inode count"
Inode count: 366268416
share ~ # debugfs /dev/mapper/share
debugfs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018)
debugfs: stat 366268416
366268416: File not found by ext2_lookup
Or did I get you wrong?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists