lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:42:11 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@...gle.com>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v7 14/16] f2fs: wire up new fscrypt ioctls

On 2019-8-3 1:31, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 04:10:15PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 2019/7/27 6:41, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>>>
>>> Wire up the new ioctls for adding and removing fscrypt keys to/from the
>>> filesystem, and the new ioctl for retrieving v2 encryption policies.
>>>
>>> FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY also required making f2fs_drop_inode() call
>>> fscrypt_drop_inode().
>>>
>>> For more details see Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst and the
>>> fscrypt patches that added the implementation of these ioctls.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>>
>> BTW, do you think it needs to make xxfs_has_support_encrypt() function be a
>> common interface defined in struct fscrypt_operations, as I see all
>> fscrypt_ioctl_*() needs to check with it, tho such cleanup is minor...
>>
> 
> Maybe.  It would work nicely for ext4 and f2fs, but ubifs does things
> differently since it automatically enables the encryption feature if needed.
> So we'd have to make the callback optional.

Correct, ubifs can leave the callback as NULL function pointer.

> 
> In any case, I think this should be separate from this patchset.

Yup, it can be done in a separated patch if need.

Thanks,

> 
> - Eric
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists