[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016211745.GA66058@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:17:45 -0700
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
Tim.Bird@...y.com, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v5] ext4: add kunit test for
decoding extended timestamps
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:58:20PM -0700, Iurii Zaikin wrote:
> KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps
> that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m]
> timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly.
> KUnit tests, which run on boot and output
> the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/).
> are only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for
> inclusion into a production build.
> Test data is derived from the table under
> Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>
You got Reviewed-bys from both Ted and myself. Unless you make
*substantial* changes you should generally include all Reviewed-bys,
Tested-bys, Acked-bys, etc in all future revisions.
Cheers!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists