[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191021091800.GC17810@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:18:00 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
Cc: jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: adjust block num when retry allocation
On Mon 21-10-19 07:23:26, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> Set block num to original *count in a case
> of retrying allocation in case num < *count
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
> ---
> Hi Jan,
>
> This patch is only compile-tested, I'm not sure if this
> kind of unexpected condition which causes reallocation
> will actually happen but baesd on the code the fix seems
> correct and better.
Yeah, you are right that we should reset 'num' back to *count. Although the
practial effect of this is minimal - we take this code path only when the
filesystem is corrupted. But still... Patch applied. Thanks!
Honza
>
> fs/ext2/balloc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> index e0cc55164505..924c1c765306 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> @@ -1404,6 +1404,7 @@ ext2_fsblk_t ext2_new_blocks(struct inode *inode, ext2_fsblk_t goal,
> * use. So we may want to selectively mark some of the blocks
> * as free
> */
> + num = *count;
> goto retry_alloc;
> }
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists