[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16df1f74b07.d3ade7d625647.885482535351431524@mykernel.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:36:18 +0800
From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
To: "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "jack" <jack@...e.com>, "linux-ext4" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: adjust block num when retry allocation
---- 在 星期一, 2019-10-21 17:18:00 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> 撰写 ----
> On Mon 21-10-19 07:23:26, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> > Set block num to original *count in a case
> > of retrying allocation in case num < *count
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
> > ---
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > This patch is only compile-tested, I'm not sure if this
> > kind of unexpected condition which causes reallocation
> > will actually happen but baesd on the code the fix seems
> > correct and better.
>
> Yeah, you are right that we should reset 'num' back to *count. Although the
> practial effect of this is minimal - we take this code path only when the
> filesystem is corrupted. But still... Patch applied. Thanks!
Thanks for your review. I found another relevant bug in ext2_try_to_allocate()
today, I'll fix it up and also plan to do some code cleanups for the allocation logic.
Do you prefer two separate patches for bugfix and cleanup or just put all in a patch series?
Thanks,
Chengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists