[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj5caXKoukPyM7Zc6A0Q+E-pBGHSV64iZe8t98OerXR_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:06:17 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Fix page_mkwrite off-by-one errors
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 6:21 AM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> +/**
> + * page_mkwrite_check_truncate - check if page was truncated
> + * @page: the page to check
> + * @inode: the inode to check the page against
> + *
> + * Returns the number of bytes in the page up to EOF,
> + * or -EFAULT if the page was truncated.
> + */
> +static inline int page_mkwrite_check_truncate(struct page *page,
> + struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
> + pgoff_t end_index = (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
This special end_index calculation seems to be redundant.
You later want "size >> PAGE_SHIFT" for another test, and that's
actually the important part.
The "+ PAGE_SIZE - 1" case is purely to handle the "AT the page
boundary is special" case, but since you have to calculate
"offset_in_page(size)" anyway, that's entirely redundant - the answer
is part of that.
So I think it would be better to write the logic as
loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
pgoff_t index = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int offset = offset_in_page(size);
if (page->mapping != inode->i_mapping)
return -EFAULT;
/* Page is wholly past the EOF page */
if (page->index > index)
return -EFAULT;
/* page is wholly inside EOF */
if (page->index < index)
return PAGE_SIZE;
/* bytes in a page? If 0, it's past EOF */
return offset ? offset : -PAGE_SIZE;
instead. That avoids the unnecessary "round up" part, and simply uses
the same EOF index for everything.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists