[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224214347.GH13895@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:43:47 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/24] btrfs: Convert from readpages to readahead
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:57:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:54:52AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:46:58AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:48:49AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > btrfs: Convert from readpages to readahead
> > > >
> > > > Implement the new readahead method in btrfs. Add a readahead_page_batch()
> > > > to optimise fetching a batch of pages at once.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this readahead_page_batch heper go into a separate patch so
> > > that it clearly stands out?
> >
> > I'll move it into 'Put readahead pages in cache earlier' for v8 (the
> > same patch where we add readahead_page())
>
> One argument for keeping it in a patch of its own is that btrfs appears
> to be the only user, and Goldwyn has a WIP conversion of btrfs to iomap,
> so it might go away pretty soon and we could just revert the commit.
>
> But this starts to get into really minor details, so I'll shut up now :)
So looking at this again I have another comment and a question.
First I think the implicit ARRAY_SIZE in readahead_page_batch is highly
dangerous, as it will do the wrong thing when passing a pointer or
function argument.
Second I wonder іf it would be worth to also switch to a batched
operation in iomap if the xarray overhead is high enough. That should
be pretty trivial, but we don't really need to do it in this series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists