[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224215324.GA16051@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:53:24 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v7 12/24] mm: Add
page_cache_readahead_unbounded
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:00:51PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
>
> ext4 and f2fs have duplicated the guts of the readahead code so
> they can read past i_size. Instead, separate out the guts of the
> readahead code so they can call it directly.
I don't like this, but then I like the horrible open coded versions
even less.. Can you add a do not use for new code comment to the
function as well?
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists