[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200226101953.A109911C05B@d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:49:52 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.com
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: using matching invalidatepage in ext4_writepage
On 2/26/20 9:40 AM, yangerkun wrote:
> Run generic/388 with journal data mode sometimes may trigger the warning
> in ext4_invalidatepage. Actually, we should use the matching invalidatepage
> in ext4_writepage.
>
> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
generic/388 still fails, but the patch makes sense to me and also avoids
kernel warning.
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index fa0ff78dc033..78e805d42ada 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ static int ext4_writepage(struct page *page,
> bool keep_towrite = false;
>
> if (unlikely(ext4_forced_shutdown(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)))) {
> - ext4_invalidatepage(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> + inode->i_mapping->a_ops->invalidatepage(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> unlock_page(page);
> return -EIO;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists