[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200226132720.GQ10728@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:27:20 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org, cmaiolino@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/6] ext4: Move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework.
On Wed 26-02-20 15:27:07, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> This patch moves ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework.
> For xattr a new 'ext4_iomap_xattr_ops' is added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
...
> -static int ext4_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode,
> - struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo)
> +static int ext4_iomap_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap)
> {
> __u64 physical = 0;
> __u64 length;
> - __u32 flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST;
> int blockbits = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
> int error = 0;
> + u16 iomap_type;
>
> /* in-inode? */
> if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_XATTR)) {
> @@ -5130,40 +4928,44 @@ static int ext4_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode,
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize;
> physical += offset;
> length = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size - offset;
> - flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE;
> brelse(iloc.bh);
> + iomap_type = IOMAP_INLINE;
> } else { /* external block */
> physical = (__u64)EXT4_I(inode)->i_file_acl << blockbits;
> length = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
> + iomap_type = IOMAP_MAPPED;
> }
If i_file_acl is 0 (i.e., no external xattr block), then I think returned
iomap should be different...
> +static int ext4_iomap_xattr_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> + loff_t length, unsigned flags,
> + struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
> {
> - ext4_lblk_t start_blk;
> - u32 ext4_fiemap_flags = FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC|FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR;
> + int error;
>
> - int error = 0;
> -
> - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) {
> - int has_inline = 1;
> + error = ext4_iomap_xattr_fiemap(inode, iomap);
> + if (error == 0 && (offset >= iomap->length))
> + error = -ENOENT;
Is ENOENT really correct here? It seems strange to me...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists