[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200227053823.3F4B34203F@d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:08:22 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org, cmaiolino@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/6] ext4: Move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework.
On 2/26/20 6:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 26-02-20 15:27:07, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> This patch moves ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework.
>> For xattr a new 'ext4_iomap_xattr_ops' is added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> ...
>
>> -static int ext4_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode,
>> - struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo)
>> +static int ext4_iomap_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap)
>> {
>> __u64 physical = 0;
>> __u64 length;
>> - __u32 flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST;
>> int blockbits = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
>> int error = 0;
>> + u16 iomap_type;
>>
>> /* in-inode? */
>> if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_XATTR)) {
>> @@ -5130,40 +4928,44 @@ static int ext4_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode,
>> EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize;
>> physical += offset;
>> length = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size - offset;
>> - flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE;
>> brelse(iloc.bh);
>> + iomap_type = IOMAP_INLINE;
>> } else { /* external block */
>> physical = (__u64)EXT4_I(inode)->i_file_acl << blockbits;
>> length = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
>> + iomap_type = IOMAP_MAPPED;
>> }
>
> If i_file_acl is 0 (i.e., no external xattr block), then I think returned
> iomap should be different...
Yes, my bad. Let me fix this please.
>
>> +static int ext4_iomap_xattr_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
>> + loff_t length, unsigned flags,
>> + struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
>> {
>> - ext4_lblk_t start_blk;
>> - u32 ext4_fiemap_flags = FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC|FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR;
>> + int error;
>>
>> - int error = 0;
>> -
>> - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) {
>> - int has_inline = 1;
>> + error = ext4_iomap_xattr_fiemap(inode, iomap);
>> + if (error == 0 && (offset >= iomap->length))
>> + error = -ENOENT;
>
> Is ENOENT really correct here? It seems strange to me...
>
Yes, -ENOENT means that there is no mapping beyond this and so iomap
core will stop querying further in iomap_fiemap.
I see that we do the same in case of inline mapping too in
ext4_iomap_begin_report().
-ritesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists