linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Check journal inode extents more carefully

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:56:42 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     luomeng <luomeng12@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Check journal inode extents more carefully

On Tue 28-07-20 17:10:28, luomeng wrote:
> 在 2020/7/27 19:44, Jan Kara 写道:
> > -int ext4_data_block_valid(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> > +int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> >   			  unsigned int count)
> >   {
> >   	struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks;
> > @@ -344,8 +346,8 @@ int ext4_data_block_valid(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> >   	 */
> >   	rcu_read_lock();
> >   	system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);
> Because of a change in the function parameters，there is no 'sbi' declared.
> So there will be a compile error:
> 
>   fs/ext4/block_validity.c: In function ‘ext4_inode_block_valid’:
>   fs/ext4/block_validity.c:345:32: error: ‘sbi’ undeclared (first use
> in this function)
>   system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks);

Hum, right. It gets fixed up in the following patch but since this patch is
marked for stable, we better fix it. Thanks for noticing!

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR