linux-ext4 - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 1/8] jbd2: make sure jh have b_transaction set in refile/unfile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200824163931.607291-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:39:24 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 1/8] jbd2: make sure jh have b_transaction set in refile/unfile_buffer

From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 24dc9864914eb5813173cfa53313fcd02e4aea7d ]

Callers of __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() assume that the b_transaction is set. In
fact if it's not, we can end up with journal_head refcounting errors
leading to crash much later that might be very hard to track down. Add
asserts to make sure that is the case.

We also make sure that b_next_transaction is NULL in
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() since the callers expect that as well and
we should not get into that stage in this state anyway, leading to
problems later on if we do.

Tested with fstests.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617092549.6712-1-lczerner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index 8de458d64134a..1478512ecab3e 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1896,6 +1896,9 @@ static void __jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_buffer(struct journal_head *jh)
  */
 static void __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer(struct journal_head *jh)
 {
+	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != NULL);
+	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == NULL);
+
 	__jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_buffer(jh);
 	jh->b_transaction = NULL;
 	jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
@@ -2443,6 +2446,13 @@ void __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(struct journal_head *jh)
 
 	was_dirty = test_clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
 	__jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_buffer(jh);
+
+	/*
+	 * b_transaction must be set, otherwise the new b_transaction won't
+	 * be holding jh reference
+	 */
+	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != NULL);
+
 	/*
 	 * We set b_transaction here because b_next_transaction will inherit
 	 * our jh reference and thus __jbd2_journal_file_buffer() must not
-- 
2.25.1