[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5F447351.6060207@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:11:29 +0800
From: yebin <yebin10@...wei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <jack@...e.com>, <tytso@....edu>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix race between do_invalidatepage and
init_page_buffers
Your patch certainly can fix the problem with my testcases, but I don't
think it's
a good way. There are other paths that can call do_invalidatepage , for
instance
block ioctl to discard and zero_range.
On 2020/8/24 23:51, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 22-08-20 16:22:16, Ye Bin wrote:
>> Ye Bin (2):
>> ext4: Add comment to BUFFER_FLAGS_DISCARD for search code
>> jbd2: Fix race between do_invalidatepage and init_page_buffers
>>
>> fs/buffer.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 7 +++++++
>> include/linux/buffer_head.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Thanks for the good description of the problem and the analysis. I could
> now easily understand what was really happening on your system. I think the
> problem should be fixed differently through - it is a problem of
> block_write_full_page() that it invalidates buffers while JBD2 is working
> with them. Attached patch should also fix the problem. Can you please test
> whether it fixes your testcase as well? Thanks!
>
> Honza
Powered by blists - more mailing lists