lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:37:49 +0100
From:   Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RWF_NOWAIT writes not failing when writing to a range with holes

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:17 PM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Mon 15-06-20 18:53:11, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > I found out a bug in btrfs where a RWF_NOWRITE does not fail if we
> > write to a range that starts with an extent followed by holes (since
> > it requires allocating extent(s)).
> >
> > When writing a test case for fstests I noticed xfs fails with -EAGAIN
> > as expected, but ext4 succeeds just like btrfs currently does:
> >
> > mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sdb
> > mount /dev/sdb /mnt
> >
> > xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 256K 0 256K" /mnt/bar
> > xfs_io -c "fpunch 64K 64K" /mnt/bar
> > sync
> > xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -b 128K -S 0xfe 0 128K" /mnt/bar
> >
> > Is this a known bug? Or is there a technical reason that makes it too
> > expensive to check no extents will need to be allocated?
>
> Thanks for report! This is actually a fallout of the conversion of ext4
> direct IO code to iomap (commit 378f32bab37 "ext4: introduce direct I/O
> write using iomap infrastructure"). I'll send a fix.

Thanks for looking into it Jan.

I just wrote a test case for fstests that exercises that case and
others where btrfs used to fail.
And I think I found some regression happened in ext4 in the meanwhile.
Basically a write into a fallocated extent that starts at eof now
fails with -EAGAIN in ext4 on a 5.9-rc6 kernel at least, but it used
to work when I found the bug in btrfs [1] (with a 5.7 kernel iirc).

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4b1946284dd6641afdb9457101056d9e6ee6204c

That new test case:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/patch/aa8318c5beb380a9e99142d1b5e776b739d04bdb.1602774113.git.fdmanana@suse.com/

Thanks.

>
>                                                                 Honza
>
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR



-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”

Powered by blists - more mailing lists