lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:55:50 +0800
From:   Chunguang Xu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>
To:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] ext4: update ext4_data_block_valid related comments

From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>

Since ext4_data_block_valid() has been renamed to ext4_inode_block_valid(),
the related comments need to be updated.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
---
 fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index 5e98ca0..03b237f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static void ext4_destroy_system_zone(struct rcu_head *rcu)
  *
  * The update of system_blks pointer in this function is protected by
  * sb->s_umount semaphore. However we have to be careful as we can be
- * racing with ext4_data_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
+ * racing with ext4_inode_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
  * protected only by RCU. That's why we first build the rbtree and then
  * swap it in place.
  */
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	/*
 	 * System blks rbtree complete, announce it once to prevent racing
-	 * with ext4_data_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same
+	 * with ext4_inode_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same
 	 * time.
 	 */
 	rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->system_blks, system_blks);
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
  *
  * The update of system_blks pointer in this function is protected by
  * sb->s_umount semaphore. However we have to be careful as we can be
- * racing with ext4_data_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
+ * racing with ext4_inode_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
  * protected only by RCU. So we first clear the system_blks pointer and
  * then free the rbtree only after RCU grace period expires.
  */
-- 
1.8.3.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists