lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 17 Apr 2021 12:24:03 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Cc:     Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard

Hi Matt,

> Like patch 1/6, I can apply it in MPTCP tree and send it later to
> net-next with other patches.
> Except if you guys prefer to apply it in KUnit tree and send it to
> linux-next?

Given 1/6 is going to net-next, it makes sense to send this out that
way too, then, IMHO.
The only slight concern I have is that the m68k test config patch in
the series will get split from the others, but that should resolve
itself when they pick up the last patch.

At the very least, this shouldn't cause any conflicts with anything
we're doing in the KUnit tree.

Cheers,
-- David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists