lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:02:48 +0200
From:   Matthieu Baerts <>
To:     David Gow <>, Nico Pache <>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Brendan Higgins <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,, Networking <>,,,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <>,
        Theodore Ts'o <>,,,
        Mark Brown <>,
        Shuah Khan <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard

Hi David, Nico,

On 17/04/2021 06:24, David Gow wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>> Like patch 1/6, I can apply it in MPTCP tree and send it later to
>> net-next with other patches.
>> Except if you guys prefer to apply it in KUnit tree and send it to
>> linux-next?
> Given 1/6 is going to net-next, it makes sense to send this out that
> way too, then, IMHO.

Mat sent this patch to net-next and David already applied it (thanks!):

> The only slight concern I have is that the m68k test config patch in
> the series will get split from the others, but that should resolve
> itself when they pick up the last patch.

I see. I guess for this MPTCP patch, we are fine because 
MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS was not used in m68k config.

 > At the very least, this shouldn't cause any conflicts with anything
 > we're doing in the KUnit tree.

Thanks for having checked!

Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions

Powered by blists - more mailing lists