[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWXd0leFtLepunVa@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:11:14 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>, Felix.Kuehling@....com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com, apopple@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT for CPU-accessible
coherent device memory
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:39:57AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Because I must ask: if this feature is for one single computer which
> presumably has a custom kernel, why add it to mainline Linux?
I think in particular patch 2 deserves to be merged because it removes
a ton of cruft from every call to put_page() (at least if you're using
a distro config). It makes me nervous, but I think it's the right
thing to do. It may well need more fixups after it has been merged,
but that's life.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists