linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT for CPU-accessible coherent device memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:24:25 -0400
From:   Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        rcampbell@...dia.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com,
        jglisse@...hat.com, apopple@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT for CPU-accessible
 coherent device memory


Am 2021-10-12 um 3:11 p.m. schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:39:57AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Because I must ask: if this feature is for one single computer which
>> presumably has a custom kernel, why add it to mainline Linux?
> I think in particular patch 2 deserves to be merged because it removes
> a ton of cruft from every call to put_page() (at least if you're using
> a distro config).  It makes me nervous, but I think it's the right
> thing to do.  It may well need more fixups after it has been merged,
> but that's life.

Maybe we should split the first two patches into a separate series, and
get it merged first, while the more controversial stuff is still under
review?

Thanks,
  Felix