lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019134952.GJ3255@quack2.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:49:52 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 3/3] ext4: simplify read_mmp_block fucntion

On Tue 19-10-21 20:39:31, Ye Bin wrote:
> This patch is according to Jan Kara's suggestion:
> I guess I would just get rid of sb_getblk() in read_mmp_block() and always
> expect valid bh passed. The only place that passes NULL bh after this
> patch is one case in ext4_multi_mount_protect() and that can call
> sb_getblk() on its own. That way we can also simplify read_mmp_block()
> prototype to:
> 
> static int read_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

...

> @@ -289,7 +279,11 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb,
>  		goto failed;
>  	}
>  
> -	retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh, mmp_block);
> +	bh = sb_getblk(sb, mmp_block);
> +	if (bh)
	^^^^^^

!bh here, please.

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ