linux-ext4 - Re: [Question] ext4/xfs: Default behavior changed after per-file DAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ef95af19-4b0a-61e8-5dfa-3e223118da8e@sandeen.net>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:29:08 -0500
From:   Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        ira.weiny@...el.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Question] ext4/xfs: Default behavior changed after per-file DAX

On 10/27/21 8:14 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 09:33:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:

...

> Hi Dave,
> 
> Thanks for all the explanaiton and background. It helps me a lot in
> wrapping my head around the rationale for current design.
> 
>> It's perfectly reasonable. If the hardware doesn't support DAX, then
>> we just always behave as if dax=never is set.
> 
> I tried mounting non-DAX block device with dax=always and it failed
> saying DAX can't be used with reflink.
> 
> [  100.371978] XFS (vdb): DAX unsupported by block device. Turning off DAX.
> [  100.374185] XFS (vdb): DAX and reflink cannot be used together!
> 
> So looks like first check tried to fallback to dax=never as device does
> not support DAX. But later reflink check thought dax is enabled and
> did not fallback to dax=never.

We need to think hard about this stuff and audit it to be sure.

But, I think that reflink check should probably just be removed, now that
DAX files and reflinked files can co-exist on a filesystem - it's just
that they can't both be active on the /same file/.

I think that even "dax=always" is still just "advisory" - it means,
try to enable dax on every file. It may still fail in the same ways as
dax=inode (default) + flag set may fail.

But ... we should go through the whole mount option / feature set /
device capability logic to be sure this is all consistent. Thanks for
pointing it out!

-Eric

>> IO