linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific mark types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:13:21 +0200
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>
Cc:     Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific
 mark types

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:17:24PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> > Like done for init flags and event types, and a macro to require a
> > specific mark type.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
> > ---
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h
> > index a2be183385e4..c67db3117e29 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h
> > @@ -373,4 +373,9 @@ static inline int fanotify_mark_supported_by_kernel(uint64_t flag)
> >       return rval;
> >  }
> >
> > +#define REQUIRE_MARK_TYPE_SUPPORTED_ON_KERNEL(mark_type) do { \
> > +     fanotify_init_flags_err_msg(#mark_type, __FILE__, __LINE__, tst_brk_, \
> > +                                 fanotify_mark_supported_by_kernel(mark_type)); \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> >  #endif /* __FANOTIFY_H__ */
>
> A nit, but I'm of the opinion that s/_ON_/_BY_ within the macro name. Otherwise,
> this looks OK to me.

Agreed. You can change that while cherry-picking to your branch ;-)

Thanks,
Amir.