linux-ext4 - Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific mark types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 17:13:41 +0100
From:   Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
To:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require
 specific mark types

Hi all,

> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com> wrote:

> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:17:24PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> > > Like done for init flags and event types, and a macro to require a
> > > specific mark type.

> > > Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
> > > ---
> > >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h | 5 +++++
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

> > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h
> > > index a2be183385e4..c67db3117e29 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h
> > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify.h
> > > @@ -373,4 +373,9 @@ static inline int fanotify_mark_supported_by_kernel(uint64_t flag)
> > >       return rval;
> > >  }

> > > +#define REQUIRE_MARK_TYPE_SUPPORTED_ON_KERNEL(mark_type) do { \
> > > +     fanotify_init_flags_err_msg(#mark_type, __FILE__, __LINE__, tst_brk_, \
> > > +                                 fanotify_mark_supported_by_kernel(mark_type)); \
> > > +} while (0)
> > > +
> > >  #endif /* __FANOTIFY_H__ */

> > A nit, but I'm of the opinion that s/_ON_/_BY_ within the macro name. Otherwise,
> > this looks OK to me.

> Agreed. You can change that while cherry-picking to your branch ;-)

+1. And yes, I'll change it while applying it into LTP (no need to repost).

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>

Kind regards,
Petr

> Thanks,
> Amir.