[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21ff4333-e567-2819-3ae0-6a2e83ec7ce6@sandeen.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 12:59:31 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices
On 10/17/21 11:40 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> this series cleans up and simplifies the association between DAX and block
> devices in preparation of allowing to mount file systems directly on DAX
> devices without a detour through block devices.
Christoph, can I ask what the end game looks like, here? If dax is completely
decoupled from block devices, are there user-visible changes? If I want to
run fs-dax on a pmem device - what do I point mkfs at, if not a block device?
Thanks,
-Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists