[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211104081740.GA23111@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:40 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 12:59:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph, can I ask what the end game looks like, here? If dax is completely
> decoupled from block devices, are there user-visible changes?
Yes.
> If I want to
> run fs-dax on a pmem device - what do I point mkfs at, if not a block device?
The rough plan is to use the device dax character devices. I'll hopefully
have a draft version in the next days.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists