[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220131170700.GA8288@magnolia>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:07:00 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: set maximum label length for ext4
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:11:19AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Set maximum label length for ext4 in _label_get_max() to be able to test
> online file system label set/get ioctls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> ---
> common/rc | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 8e351f17..50d6d0bd 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -4545,6 +4545,9 @@ _label_get_max()
> f2fs)
> echo 255
> ;;
> + ext2|ext3|ext4)
> + echo 16
After reviewing the ext4 ondisk format, 16 is the correct value.
Though I wonder, what actually prevents generic/492 from running on old
kernels without GETLABEL support?
Either way this patch is ok, so...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
--D
> + ;;
> *)
> _notrun "$FSTYP does not define maximum label length"
> ;;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists