linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/7] generic/{171,172,173,174,204}: check _scratch_mkfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:35:48 -0800
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To:     Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc:     fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] generic/{171,172,173,174,204}: check
 _scratch_mkfs_sized return code

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:55:36PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> The test cases generic/{171,172,173,174,204} call _scratch_mkfs before
> _scratch_mkfs_sized, and they do not check return code of
> _scratch_mkfs_sized. Even if _scratch_mkfs_sized failed, _scratch_mount
> after it cannot detect the sized mkfs failure because _scratch_mkfs
> already created a file system on the device. This results in unexpected
> test condition of the test cases.
> 
> To avoid the unexpected test condition, check return code of
> _scratch_mkfs_sized in the test cases.
> 
> Suggested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>

Hm.  I wonder, are there other tests that employ this _scratch_mkfs ->
scratch_mkfs_sized sequence and need patching?

$ git grep -l _scratch_mkfs_sized | while read f; do grep -q
'_scratch_mkfs[[:space:]]' $f && echo $f; done
common/encrypt
common/rc
tests/ext4/021
tests/generic/171
tests/generic/172
tests/generic/173
tests/generic/174
tests/generic/204
tests/generic/520
tests/generic/525
tests/xfs/015

generic/520 is a false positive, and you patched the rest.  OK, good.

I wonder if the maintainer will ask for the _scratch_mkfs_sized in the
failure output, but as far as I'm concerned:

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>

--D

> ---
>  tests/generic/171 | 2 +-
>  tests/generic/172 | 2 +-
>  tests/generic/173 | 2 +-
>  tests/generic/174 | 2 +-
>  tests/generic/204 | 3 ++-
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/171 b/tests/generic/171
> index fb2a6f14..f823a454 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/171
> +++ b/tests/generic/171
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ sz_bytes=$((nr_blks * 8 * blksz))
>  if [ $sz_bytes -lt $((32 * 1048576)) ]; then
>  	sz_bytes=$((32 * 1048576))
>  fi
> -_scratch_mkfs_sized $sz_bytes >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $sz_bytes >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
>  _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>  rm -rf $testdir
>  mkdir $testdir
> diff --git a/tests/generic/172 b/tests/generic/172
> index ab5122fa..383824b9 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/172
> +++ b/tests/generic/172
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ umount $SCRATCH_MNT
>  
>  file_size=$((768 * 1024 * 1024))
>  fs_size=$((1024 * 1024 * 1024))
> -_scratch_mkfs_sized $fs_size >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $fs_size >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
>  _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>  rm -rf $testdir
>  mkdir $testdir
> diff --git a/tests/generic/173 b/tests/generic/173
> index 0eb313e2..e1493278 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/173
> +++ b/tests/generic/173
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ sz_bytes=$((nr_blks * 8 * blksz))
>  if [ $sz_bytes -lt $((32 * 1048576)) ]; then
>  	sz_bytes=$((32 * 1048576))
>  fi
> -_scratch_mkfs_sized $sz_bytes >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $sz_bytes >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
>  _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>  rm -rf $testdir
>  mkdir $testdir
> diff --git a/tests/generic/174 b/tests/generic/174
> index 1505453e..c7a177b8 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/174
> +++ b/tests/generic/174
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ sz_bytes=$((nr_blks * 8 * blksz))
>  if [ $sz_bytes -lt $((32 * 1048576)) ]; then
>  	sz_bytes=$((32 * 1048576))
>  fi
> -_scratch_mkfs_sized $sz_bytes >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $sz_bytes >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
>  _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>  rm -rf $testdir
>  mkdir $testdir
> diff --git a/tests/generic/204 b/tests/generic/204
> index a3dabb71..b5deb443 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/204
> +++ b/tests/generic/204
> @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ _scratch_mkfs 2> /dev/null | _filter_mkfs 2> $tmp.mkfs > /dev/null
>  [ $FSTYP = "xfs" ] && MKFS_OPTIONS="$MKFS_OPTIONS -l size=16m -i maxpct=50"
>  
>  SIZE=`expr 115 \* 1024 \* 1024`
> -_scratch_mkfs_sized $SIZE $dbsize 2> /dev/null > $tmp.mkfs.raw
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $SIZE $dbsize 2> /dev/null > $tmp.mkfs.raw \
> +	|| _fail "mkfs failed"
>  cat $tmp.mkfs.raw | _filter_mkfs 2> $tmp.mkfs > /dev/null
>  _scratch_mount
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>