[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220209003604.GD8288@magnolia>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:36:04 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs/015: check _scratch_mkfs_sized return code
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:55:38PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> The test cases xfs/015 calls _scratch_mkfs before _scratch_mkfs_sized,
> and does not check return code of _scratch_mkfs_sized. Even if
> _scratch_mkfs_sized failed, _scratch_mount after it cannot detect the
> sized mkfs failure because _scratch_mkfs already created a file system
> on the device. This results in unexpected test condition.
>
> To avoid the unexpected test condition, check return code of
> _scratch_mkfs_sized.
>
> Suggested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
--D
> ---
> tests/xfs/015 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/015 b/tests/xfs/015
> index 86fa6336..2bb7b8d5 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/015
> +++ b/tests/xfs/015
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ _scratch_mount
> _require_fs_space $SCRATCH_MNT 131072
> _scratch_unmount
>
> -_scratch_mkfs_sized $((32 * 1024 * 1024)) > $tmp.mkfs.raw
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $((32 * 1024 * 1024)) > $tmp.mkfs.raw || _fail "mkfs failed"
> cat $tmp.mkfs.raw | _filter_mkfs >$seqres.full 2>$tmp.mkfs
> # get original data blocks number and agcount
> . $tmp.mkfs
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists