[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkqP36q+exOy3wqa84ziRE6E=ThccGH9rpYC6f8H7RXwWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:49:19 -0800
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: coredump.h: clarify the use of MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 12:45 AM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022/3/1 7:57, Yang Shi wrote:
> > MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE is set as long as the mm is available for khugepaged by
> > khugepaged_enter(), not only when VM_HUGEPAGE is set on vma. Correct
> > the comment to avoid confusion.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/sched/coredump.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> > index 4d9e3a656875..4d0a5be28b70 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> > @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static inline int get_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > #endif
> > /* leave room for more dump flags */
> > #define MMF_VM_MERGEABLE 16 /* KSM may merge identical pages */
> > -#define MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE 17 /* set when VM_HUGEPAGE is set on vma */
> > +#define MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE 17 /* set when mm is available for
> > + khugepaged */
>
> I think this comment could be written in one line. Anyway, this patch looks good to me.
> Thanks.
Yes, as long as we don't care about the 80 characters limit. I know
the limit was bumped to 100 by checkpatch, but I have seen 80 was
still preferred by a lot of people.
>
> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Thanks.
>
> > /*
> > * This one-shot flag is dropped due to necessity of changing exe once again
> > * on NFS restore
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists