[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f75b0110-ae41-835a-0fb2-8fbdc2d8225a@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:39:58 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
CC: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
<darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: coredump.h: clarify the use of MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE
On 2022/3/2 5:49, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 12:45 AM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2022/3/1 7:57, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE is set as long as the mm is available for khugepaged by
>>> khugepaged_enter(), not only when VM_HUGEPAGE is set on vma. Correct
>>> the comment to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/sched/coredump.h | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
>>> index 4d9e3a656875..4d0a5be28b70 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
>>> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static inline int get_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm)
>>> #endif
>>> /* leave room for more dump flags */
>>> #define MMF_VM_MERGEABLE 16 /* KSM may merge identical pages */
>>> -#define MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE 17 /* set when VM_HUGEPAGE is set on vma */
>>> +#define MMF_VM_HUGEPAGE 17 /* set when mm is available for
>>> + khugepaged */
>>
>> I think this comment could be written in one line. Anyway, this patch looks good to me.
>> Thanks.
>
> Yes, as long as we don't care about the 80 characters limit. I know
> the limit was bumped to 100 by checkpatch, but I have seen 80 was
> still preferred by a lot of people.
I see. Many thanks for clarifying.
>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>>> /*
>>> * This one-shot flag is dropped due to necessity of changing exe once again
>>> * on NFS restore
>>>
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists