[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <647cc60d-18d4-ab53-6c91-52c1f6d29c3a@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:01:45 +0800
From: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linfeilong <linfeilong@...wei.com>,
<liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Subject: e2fsck: do not skip deeper checkers when s_last_orphan list has
truncated inodes
If the system crashes when a file is being truncated, we will get a
problematic inode,
and it will be added into fs->super->s_last_orphan.
When we run `e2fsck -a img`, the s_last_orphan list will be traversed
and deleted.
During this period, orphan inodes in the s_last_orphan list with
i_links_count==0 can
be deleted, and orphan inodes with i_links_count !=0 (ex. the truncated
inode)
cannot be deleted. However, when there are some orphan inodes with
i_links_count !=0,
the EXT2_VALID_FS is still assigned to fs->super->s_state, the deeper
checkers are skipped
with some inconsistency problems.
Here, we will clean EXT2_VALID_FS flag when there is orphan inodes with
i_links_count !=0
for deeper checkers.
Problems with truncated files.
[root@...alhost ~]# e2fsck -a img
img: recovering journal
img: Truncating orphaned inode 188 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=0100666, size=0)
img: Truncating orphaned inode 174 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=0100666, size=0)
img: clean, 484/128016 files, 118274/512000 blocks
[root@...alhost ~]# e2fsck -fn img
e2fsck 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 174, i_blocks is 2, should be 0. Fix? no
Inode 188, i_blocks is 2, should be 0. Fix? no
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
img: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
img: 484/128016 files (24.6% non-contiguous), 118274/512000 blocks
[root@...alhost ~]# e2fsck -a img
img: clean, 484/128016 files, 118274/512000 blocks
But, if run `e2fsck -f img`, EXT2_VALID_FS flag will be clean, so do
`e2fsck -a img` again,
can fix this problem.
[root@...alhost ~]# e2fsck -f img
e2fsck 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 174, i_blocks is 2, should be 0. Fix<y>? no
Inode 188, i_blocks is 2, should be 0. Fix<y>? no
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
img: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
img: 484/128016 files (24.6% non-contiguous), 118274/512000 blocks
[root@...alhost ~]# e2fsck -a img
img was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
img: Inode 174, i_blocks is 2, should be 0. FIXED.
img: Inode 188, i_blocks is 2, should be 0. FIXED.
img: 484/128016 files (24.6% non-contiguous), 118274/512000 blocks
Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>
---
e2fsck/super.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/e2fsck/super.c b/e2fsck/super.c
index 9495e029..f4a414b7 100644
--- a/e2fsck/super.c
+++ b/e2fsck/super.c
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ static int release_orphan_inode(e2fsck_t ctx,
ext2_ino_t *ino, char *block_buf)
inode.i_dtime = ctx->now;
} else {
inode.i_dtime = 0;
+ fs->super->s_state &= ~EXT2_VALID_FS;
}
e2fsck_write_inode_full(ctx, *ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
sizeof(inode), "delete_file");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists