[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <165155054451.879437.9981369991787776986.b4-ty@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 00:02:45 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: no parent lookup in disconnected dir
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:35:30 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Don't call into ext2fs_get_pathname() to do a name lookup for a
> disconnected directory, since the directory block traversal in
> pass1 has already scanned all of the leaf blocks and never finds
> the entry, always printing "???". If the name entry had been
> found earlier, the directory would not be disconnected in pass3.
>
> Instead, lookup ".." and print the parent name in the prompt, and
> then do not search for the current directory name at all. This
> avoids a useless full directory scan for each disconnected entry,
> which can potentially be slow if the parent directory is large.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] e2fsck: no parent lookup in disconnected dir
commit: 6b0e3bd7bd2f2db3c3993c5d91379ad55e60b51e
Best regards,
--
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists