lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvT2wslkHNKKuDY8@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 05:32:02 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     guaneryu@...il.com, zlang@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        fstests@...r.kernel.org, guan@...u.me, tytso@....edu,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] common/rc: move ext4-specific helpers into a
 separate common/ext4 file

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 02:00:46PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -512,6 +512,10 @@ _source_specific_fs()
>  		;;
>  	ext4)
>  		[ "$MKFS_EXT4_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.ext4 not found"
> +		. ./common/ext4
> +		;;
> +	ext2|ext3|ext4dev)
> +		. ./common/ext4

Not really new in this patch, but why does ext4 check for a specific
mkfs and the others don't?

Also can we drop ext4dev while we're at it?

The patch itself looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ