| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:46:16 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+9543479984ae9e576000@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
<tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ext4_bmap
The inode_lock(inode) in vfs_fileattr_set() is a regular file inode and
inode_lock_shared(inode) in ext4_bmap() is a journal inode.
So this might be a false positive deadlock warning.
Thanks,
Jason
On 2022/8/8 15:33, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: ca688bff68bc Add linux-next specific files for 20220808
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=177eb001080000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4c20e006003cdecb
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9543479984ae9e576000
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+9543479984ae9e576000@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.19.0-next-20220808-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor.3/15950 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88801b348400 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:771 [inline]
> ffff88801b348400 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_bmap+0x4e/0x460 fs/ext4/inode.c:3157
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88814bede3f8 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_flush+0x487/0xc00 fs/jbd2/journal.c:2472
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
> mutex_lock_io_nested+0x13f/0x1190 kernel/locking/mutex.c:833
> __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x234/0x460 fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:110
> add_transaction_credits+0xa2d/0xb70 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:298
> start_this_handle+0x3ae/0x14a0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:422
> jbd2__journal_start+0x38c/0x910 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:520
> __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x3a3/0x490 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:105
> __ext4_journal_start fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:326 [inline]
> ext4_dirty_inode+0x9d/0x110 fs/ext4/inode.c:5963
> __mark_inode_dirty+0x48b/0x1040 fs/fs-writeback.c:2381
> mark_inode_dirty include/linux/fs.h:2467 [inline]
> generic_write_end+0x350/0x440 fs/buffer.c:2199
> ext4_da_write_end+0x16e/0x9a0 fs/ext4/inode.c:3089
> generic_perform_write+0x306/0x560 mm/filemap.c:3749
> ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x15b/0x460 fs/ext4/file.c:270
> ext4_file_write_iter+0x44a/0x1660 fs/ext4/file.c:679
> call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
> do_iter_readv_writev+0x20b/0x3b0 fs/read_write.c:729
> do_iter_write+0x182/0x700 fs/read_write.c:855
> vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:896
> iter_file_splice_write+0x741/0xc90 fs/splice.c:686
> do_splice_from fs/splice.c:764 [inline]
> direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:931
> splice_direct_to_actor+0x331/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:886
> do_splice_direct+0x1a7/0x270 fs/splice.c:974
> do_sendfile+0xb19/0x1270 fs/read_write.c:1249
> __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1311 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1303 [inline]
> __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x149/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1303
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
> down_read+0x98/0x450 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
> inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:771 [inline]
> ext4_bmap+0x4e/0x460 fs/ext4/inode.c:3157
> bmap+0xaa/0x120 fs/inode.c:1799
> jbd2_journal_bmap+0xa8/0x180 fs/jbd2/journal.c:971
> __jbd2_journal_erase fs/jbd2/journal.c:1784 [inline]
> jbd2_journal_flush+0x84f/0xc00 fs/jbd2/journal.c:2490
> ext4_ioctl_checkpoint fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1082 [inline]
> __ext4_ioctl+0x28fd/0x4ab0 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1586
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
> lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8);
> lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
> lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 2 locks held by syz-executor.3/15950:
> #0: ffff88814bede170 (&journal->j_barrier){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_lock_updates+0x15e/0x310 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:904
> #1: ffff88814bede3f8 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_flush+0x487/0xc00 fs/jbd2/journal.c:2472
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 15950 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.19.0-next-20220808-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
> down_read+0x98/0x450 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
> inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:771 [inline]
> ext4_bmap+0x4e/0x460 fs/ext4/inode.c:3157
> bmap+0xaa/0x120 fs/inode.c:1799
> jbd2_journal_bmap+0xa8/0x180 fs/jbd2/journal.c:971
> __jbd2_journal_erase fs/jbd2/journal.c:1784 [inline]
> jbd2_journal_flush+0x84f/0xc00 fs/jbd2/journal.c:2490
> ext4_ioctl_checkpoint fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1082 [inline]
> __ext4_ioctl+0x28fd/0x4ab0 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1586
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7feb4e689279
> Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007feb4f798168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007feb4e79bf80 RCX: 00007feb4e689279
> RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 000000004004662b RDI: 0000000000000005
> RBP: 00007feb4e6e3189 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007ffc38bb538f R14: 00007feb4f798300 R15: 0000000000022000
> </TASK>
>
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists