[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2y0cspSZG5dt6c+@sol.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:21:06 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fsverity: stop using PG_error to track error status
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:58:07AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
> As a step towards freeing the PG_error flag for other uses, change ext4
> and f2fs to stop using PG_error to track verity errors. Instead, if a
> verity error occurs, just mark the whole bio as failed. The coarser
> granularity isn't really a problem since it isn't any worse than what
> the block layer provides, and errors from a multi-page readahead aren't
> reported to applications unless a single-page read fails too.
>
> f2fs supports compression, which makes the f2fs changes a bit more
> complicated than desired, but the basic premise still works.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> In v3, I made a small simplification to the f2fs changes. I'm also only
> sending the fsverity patch now, since the fscrypt one is now upstream.
>
> fs/ext4/readpage.c | 8 ++----
> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> fs/verity/verify.c | 12 ++++-----
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
I've applied this to the fsverity tree for 6.2.
Reviews would be greatly appreciated, of course.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists