lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y36ccbZq9gsnbmWw@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:19:29 +0000 From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fsverity: stop using PG_error to track error status On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:21:06AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:58:07AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> > > > > As a step towards freeing the PG_error flag for other uses, change ext4 > > and f2fs to stop using PG_error to track verity errors. Instead, if a > > verity error occurs, just mark the whole bio as failed. The coarser > > granularity isn't really a problem since it isn't any worse than what > > the block layer provides, and errors from a multi-page readahead aren't > > reported to applications unless a single-page read fails too. > > > > f2fs supports compression, which makes the f2fs changes a bit more > > complicated than desired, but the basic premise still works. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> > > --- > > > > In v3, I made a small simplification to the f2fs changes. I'm also only > > sending the fsverity patch now, since the fscrypt one is now upstream. > > > > fs/ext4/readpage.c | 8 ++---- > > fs/f2fs/compress.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > fs/f2fs/data.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > fs/verity/verify.c | 12 ++++----- > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > I've applied this to the fsverity tree for 6.2. > > Reviews would be greatly appreciated, of course. > Jaegeuk and Chao, can I get a review or ack from one of you? - Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists